A Brief Note On Environmental Racism Of Los Angeles

Mihaela D. Vincze 07/15/15 Davidson Geog 350 Environmental Racism in Los Angeles Racism consists of philosophies and ideologies that aim to cause the unequal distribution of privileges, goods or rights amongst different racial groups. Our society’s forebearers planted the seeds of discrimination into our consciousness, as racism stems back into the middle ages. Many of our citizens are classified as second class, being disadvantaged in areas that other citizens are not. There is not a sense of urgency when discussing the continuing issue of racism, as many people believe it has been eradicated. However, racism can exist in many forms- some being less obvious than others. In particular, Los Angeles has had a long history of racial†¦show more content†¦Warren County became a token of a new philosophy called environmental racism as people of low socioeconomic status and people of color were victims to ecological risks (Mohai 2009). This superiority complex is a continuing issue and is ingrained in the way people treat each other today. Racism stems back into the middle ages. During the Renaissance period, Europeans were coming into contact with people of darker pigmentation in Asia, the Americas and Africa. These Europeans were making judgments about these darker people since they weren’t used to such appearances. Ultimately, they justified their rationale for enslaving Africans due to their disbelief of god. They were thought of as heathens, and this offended them. Slave owners and slave traders sometimes interpreted a passage in the book of Genesis as their justification. Even during the Enlightenment period that paved the way for great scientific innovations had many defenders of racism. They believed that races constituted different species- some being superior to others, (Fredrickson 2003) The Environmental Protection Agency defined environmental justice as the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. People shouldn’t be grouped in communities based off

Clueless Essay - 1369 Words

â€Å"How has Amy Heckerling used film techniques to portray the transformation of ‘Cher’ in her film, ‘Clueless’?† In the hit film of 1995 -Clueless, director Amy Heckerling effectively uses film techniques to further portray the deep meaning of the story. The film tells the story of a selfish teenage girl who transforms into a responsible woman. In the beginning of the story, the main protagonist, Cher, is depicted as a narrow-minded, extravagant teenager. Heckerling uses vivid colour and extremity to show Cher’s unique characteristics. For her own interests, Cher begins to help others but begins to find more than just her own outcomes in the process. The director uses indirect actions to show the change in Cher’s character. At the end of†¦show more content†¦Cher successfully changed her poor school results by convincing her teachers she deserved better grades. This aspect of her personality shows her father’s influence, his profession –litigation. Also, Cher’s naà ¯vetà © is well demonstrated in this quote – â€Å"Isn’t my house a cl assic; the columns date all the way back to 1972†. The director, Heckerling, brilliantly extracted Cher’s character using film and studio techniques. Being one of America’s most recognised film directors, Amy Heckerling used clever film techniques to show the character of the main protagonist, Cher Horowitz. Throughout the beginning of the film, Cher is dressed in brightly-coloured designer clothes which make her stand out from the rest of the characters; dressed in bland, dark-coloured simple clothing. This technique perfectly showed how different Cher was to other people; Cher thought she was a ‘typical’ teenager and this is contradicted using this technique in the film. Also, Cher’s life is shown to the public as being ‘perfect’; she lives in a mansion, drives an expensive Jeep, wears designer clothes and is popular. In Clueless, the director has put an emphasis on the mise-en-scà ¨ne. The mise-en-scà ¨ne has been used to show what is going on in Cher’s mind and also to show her peculiarity. In one scene, when Cher’s father, Mel, has clients working at his house franticall y, Cher is in a timeShow MoreRelatedThe Connection Between Clueless and Emma Essay594 Words   |  3 PagesThe Connection Between Clueless and Emma A valuable connection can be made be made between Jane Austens Emma and Amy Heckerlings Clueless although fashion, customs, society and language differ between the two. The connection is made through the plot, characters and inevitable human nature. The themes of vanity, rank, status and gossip link the two medias and create a valuable linkage in relating the 19th century life with the contemporary world. Fashion is constantlyRead MoreComparative Analysis Between Emma and Clueless Essay1801 Words   |  8 Pagesunderstanding of societal values and attitudes present in the texts. Jane Austens book Emma(1816), relevant to society in Regency England, is relived in a modern day context relevant to the 20th century American society in Amy Heckerlings â€Å"teen flick† Clueless(1995). Social status plays a crucial part in both texts. â€Å"Emma Woodhouse, handsome, clever, and rich, with a comfortable home and a happy disposition...†(pg.1,chap.1) lived in nineteenth century Regency England, where social status was dictatedRead MoreA Comparison Between Film Versions of Emma and Clueless Essay790 Words   |  4 PagesVersions of Emma and Clueless The features I will look for in both films for comparison is setting, location, lighting, costumes, props, camera angles, dialogue and weather. Emma is set in the early 20th century and Clueless in the 1990s. The director changed the era to refer to the fact that girls nowadays are more mature than young women in the early 20th century. The diversity between the locations in both films is very minor. In Clueless it is set in Beverly HillsRead MoreEmma and Clueless Essay1975 Words   |  8 PagesHow has the change in context of Emma and clueless shaped the values conveyed in the two texts? In Amy Heckerlings 1995 film clueless we see the deep transformation of Jane Austin’s more conservative 19th century classic Emma. In clueless we see the values and themes of high culture literature combined with the modern context of teenage society in the 20th century. The transformation of Jane Austens novel Emma to the 20th century film Clueless by Amy Heckerling allows for the same themes of socialRead MoreEmma and Clueless Essay897 Words   |  4 PagesIt seems to be a reoccurring theme these days for movie writers to recycle old concepts and story lines. This is the exact case in the popular 1995 film Clueless written and directed by Amy Heckerling. This film seems to be all about the trials of the good life in Beverly Hills, but if one looks deeper it is actually a modern take on the classic novel Emma by Jane Austen. When closely examined one can see how the two main characters are exactly alike except they are matched to their own particularRead MoreComparing Clu eless and Emma Essay1816 Words   |  8 PagesCLUELESS VS. EMMA Adaptations of Jane Austen’s, Emma, are usually period pieces diligent in capturing and replicating the manners, dress, language and values of the original text. Clueless, written and directed by Amy Heckerling, deviates drastically from the norm, as the film is not a period piece. While Emma is set in the early nineteenth century in the country village of Highbury, sixteen miles out of London, England, Clueless is set in Bronson Alcott High School almost two hundred years laterRead MoreA Clueless Community in The Giver by Mrs. Lowry Essay614 Words   |  3 Pagesinto her arms,† (13) he in this passage is Jonas’ dad. For the kids in this place, it’s very exciting to get your sibling because it’s the only other sibling they will ever have. This system helps the community avoid overpopulation. Throughout this essay a reader can tell that this community is very different than a normal community. The positive things about this community is that everybody is supposedly treated equally. One of the many negative things about this community is that there is no privacyRead MoreMy Thanks to Professor Payte835 Words   |  4 Pagesvarious exercises designed to assist our thinking process for an upcoming essay which signaled the end of one progression and the beginning of another; in total, three progressions were assigned. My developmental writing process began with the progressions, and in this portfolio I have included revised copies of two progressions and one revised exercise that reveal the changes made to benefit my writing style. Prior to the essays, I had, as well as everybody else, to complete several exercises thatRead MoreMy Journey As A Writer1091 Words   |  5 Pagesabout some life lessons other than discipline and hard work. â€Å"Please write a short essay about a cat,† an instruction given by my teacher was the beginning of my development as a writer. It was my first task on writing a Malay essay during primary school. Being clueless at that time, I sat down with a paper and pencil for like ages. A lot of questions came to my mind; why the teacher asked me to write a short essay although I am only 8 years old? how should I begin writing it? Luckily, my mother wasRead MoreReflection On My First Semester Portfolio1391 Words   |  6 Pagesdo that I set schedules for myself as soon as I get a due date for a paper, this way I have time to write multiple rough drafts and make my papers the best they can be. My last goal was to edit my papers more. To do this I asked people to read my essays and edit them, after I had gone through them multiple times and corrected any errors present. Overall, I believe I met all three of my goals throughout this I have gone through all the steps I set in order to ac complish these goals. As the semester

Employee Relations for Healthy Working Conditions - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theEmployee Relations for Healthy Working Conditions and Maternity Leave. Answer: There is no gain stating the fact that the labour unions have indeed played a crucial role during the 19th to20th century, in establishing professional standards for various industries and securing employee rights for all the workers, in terms of getting benefits like minimum wage, healthy working conditions, maternity leave and others. However, in todays world, the average job tenure of employees has fallen to as low as 4.4 years and hence the bargaining agreements between the union representing the employee perspectives and the employers make little sense. First of all, before arguing against the importance of trade unions representing employees needs in the present world, it is important to state that most of the organizations operate in flat hierarchies, and the team-based works they engage in, make it difficult to distinguish labour and management. Besides, unlike the traditional work environment scenario, many employees presently work on contracts, are self-employed or are working as freelancers, and in such a dynamic working scenario, the traditional unions have little or nothing to do. Amongst the other nations, Australia is also one of the least unionised countries where a mere fifteen percent of Australian employees are affiliated with any traditional labour union. Among the young, the participation rate is as low as 6%. The same holds true for USA, Nrth Carolina or South Dakota, where only 3% of the employees have connection with the unions (Barrows, 2017). According to the research report submitted by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the trade union membership of the employees has been experiencing a sharp decline. The major reason behind the decline lies in the inability of the union members to adapt to the present scenario. The trade unions can still remain relevant, if they can adapt themselves to the structural changes of the economy. With the increased rise of the service sector, growth of the small firms as well as downsizing of the government, the union will need to re-adjust and adapt itself to suit the present needs. The unions, in the present world cannot operate if they still adapt the union movement strategy of the past decades, and can only survive if they can adopt a more dynamic, internet-based society and financial world. To substantiate this argument, one can refer to the 2011 incident when the customers getting upset over the Bank of America for charging people for using debit cards, used Intern et-based social media to protest and forced the company to back-down (Hassel, 2014). Thus, there is always a future for the labour unions, if they agree to re-invent their structures and tactics of operation. The labour unions should try to eliminate its collective bargaining process, and focus on creating social movement pressures while trying to represent the employees. Given the present period of economic depression, it would be extremely an indiscreet decision for the management authority of an organization to count out the labour unions. The union still remains a powerful force in todays world, and it does need to come forward to negotiate for better pay and flexible working conditions, in the competitive market. However, it needs to embrace new forms to execute the historic function of representing the employee needs and concerns. Reference List: Barrows, T. S. (2017).What do unions do?: a twenty-year perspective. Routledge. Hassel, A. (2014). Trade unions and the Future of Democratic Capitalism.

The War Of Freedom Of Expression Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper The War of Freedom of Expression # 8220 ; Taking on Jew-baiters and Holocaust deniers in the consecrated courtroom environment is like reacting to person who calls your female parent a cocotte. By supporting you raise the inquiry that possibly she truly was # 8221 ; Anonymous beginning drawn from Weiman and Win, 1986. The right to freedom of look can be described as a war. It is a war that has lasted for centuries and may last for centuries more. It is a war between freedom of look and societal intolerance. In this war there are many conflicts. The conflict on which this brief essay centres itself is the conflict between freedom of address and Torahs restricting that freedom ; more specifically the ability to distribute hate propaganda and the # 8220 ; detest Torahs # 8221 ; . Included in the essay is a brief lineation of one brush that has taken topographic point ( Keegstra ) . Those who battle on the side back uping freedom of address do so for several grounds. We will write a custom essay sample on The War Of Freedom Of Expression Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Braun declares that it is a basic democratic right to voice your ain sentiment. Douglas Christie has gained ill fame for his vigorous representation of high- profile, controversial clients, charged under the hatred Torahs. He advocates freedom of address for two chief grounds: a ) he finds it abhorrent that the province can pass ideas and words, and B ) he frequently agrees with the positions held by his clients. Others such as Noam Chomsky, a superb rational, argue non for the positions expressed, but the ability to show them. Lining up on the other side of the conflict you have: Derek Raymaker, David Kilgour, Victor Ramraj, and Bruce Elman. They argue that there is decidedly a moral topographic point for Torahs sing hatred address, whether they are condemnable or non. There was late a new development in the Canadian war for freedom of look. Introduced in April 1982 was a new and of import strategic battlefield. With the Charter of Rights and Freedoms the war could be won or lost by either side. It was non long before the Charter saw conflict. In 1984, Jim Keegstra was charged with go againsting subdivision 281 of the Condemnable Code of Canada ( now covered under subdivision 318-320 ) . Keegstra was a respected school instructor and city manager of the little town of Eckville, Alberta. This was no marginal overzealous ; this was an elected functionary charged with advancing hatred. However by the clip Keegstra # 8217 ; s test rolled around he was no longer the city manager Eckville and his instruction licence, revoked. The job was, the really nature of s. 281 Lent itself to legal argument under subdivision 2 of the comparatively new Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The defence advocate Doug Christie lost no clip in disputing the statute law # 8217 ; s constitutionality. In response, Crown prosecuting officer, Bruce Fraser, stated that Keegstra was being charged with advancing hatred ; non showing it. The Crown besides stated that freedom of address is non an absolute right. On November 5, 1984, Mr. Justice Quigley of the Alberta Queen # 8217 ; s Bench wrote an 80 page determination continuing the constitutionality of subdivision 281. In his determination he stated # 8220 ; It is my sentiment that s. 281.2 ( 2 ) can non be rationally considered to be an violation which limits # 8216 ; freedom of look # 8217 ; but on the contrary it is a precaution which promotes it. # 8221 ; When the issue eventually rose to the Supreme Court of Canada, the advocators of hatred Torahs had won a really shallow triumph. The split of the tribunal was 4-3, go forthing uncertainness as to who had really won. It is excessively subjective to see the job of freedom of look as # 8220 ; good # 8221 ; versus # 8220 ; evil # 8221 ; . The argument raises the chief issue of whether or non the people of Canada want the authorities to be go throughing any Torahs restricting our rights to believe and talk. While it is about consentaneous that violently moving on these positions is illegal ; the argument on Torahs against address of any kind draws non merely racialists, but simple progressives who believe in the freedom of address. Braun outlines the statement against any condemnable restrictions on freedom of address. First, he states that one of the basic premises of democracy is that: # 8220 ; A autonomous people that have the right and ability to make up ones mind for themselves whom to believe must certainly hold the right and ability to make up ones mind what to move on. # 8221 ; Another point made by Braun, in the same article, is that the right to pass against words, even narrowly defined such as words of # 8216 ; incitation # 8217 ; # 8220 ; tends to gnaw the political procedure of speaking and genuine debate. # 8221 ; Other such statements lift up against the legitimacy of such hate Torahs. Douglas Christie, in Zundel, declared that the right to a minority sentiment was at interest. In his reference to the jury he asked # 8220 ; What are we lobotomized imbeciles, that we can merely accept the point of view of the bulk? # 8230 ; Do we neer entrench the right to differ? # 8221 ; Christie besides compared Zundel to Galileo, who dared to articulate that the universe was unit of ammunition. He besides stated: # 8220 ; For the interest of freedom, I ask you neer to bury what is at interest here. That accused bases in the topographic point of anyone who desire to talk their head. Even if you don # 8217 ; t agree with him, you must take it as a sacred duty non to let the suppression of person else # 8217 ; s honest opinion. # 8221 ; Chomsky takes much the same route. Respected the universe over is non needfully Chomsky # 8217 ; s positions, but his ability to show them and his apprehension of the jobs society faces. In a 1988 interview Chomsky stated # 8220 ; # 8230 ; I wouldn # 8217 ; t like the authorities to hold the power to make up ones mind what you can hear. # 8221 ; With regard to a Gallic school instructor being tried for disproof of history he said, # 8220 ; # 8230 ; . Now that means that the province has the right to make up ones mind what is historical truth, and if it decides # 8220 ; this is historical truth # 8221 ; and you say something else, you # 8217 ; re a condemnable. In my position, that # 8217 ; s a antic dirt, I don # 8217 ; t care whether what the cat said is true, false, indifferent ; I don # 8217 ; t even give a darn what he said. The thought of giving the province the right to make up ones mind what # 8217 ; s true, that # 8217 ; s merely directly, flat-out fascism. # 8221 ; Those who advocate the passing of # 8220 ; detest Torahs # 8221 ; such as subdivisions 318 through 320 of the Criminal Code, besides seem to be reasoning from a mostly moralistic point of view. They besides province that it is highly hard for the Crown to convict under the Torahs. True, yes it is, and that is the manner it should be. Four advocates of these Torahs are Derek Raymaker, David Kilgour, Victor Ramraj and Bruce Elman. They all put forth different statement, each contention with its ain virtues. Raymaker and Kilgour have stated that it is of import to acknowledge that rights are neer absolute. They besides province that # 8220 ; Rights are given strength through the jurisprudence, and hence can be regulated through the jurisprudence in sensible fortunes as prescribed in s.1 of the Charter. # 8221 ; This is a hard stance to take in a democratic and purportedly # 8220 ; free # 8221 ; society. Are rights given by the province, or are they cardinal rights that the province must merely continue? This is where the existent trouble lies. Peoples in western democracies recognize ability to talk freely as an built-in right, and non as one liberally given to us by our elected functionaries. In defence of the Kilgour and Raymaker statement, they besides province that # 8220 ; # 8230 ; freedom of look can non merely be without a system of damages for those groups who feel besieged by the hatemonger # 8217 ; s message. # 8221 ; This is of import. However, it should non be handled by condemnable jurisprudence. This issue could be addressed in civil jurisprudence and human rights statute law without enforcing condemnable countenances on the # 8220 ; hatemongers # 8221 ; . Victor Ramraj refers to both Ronald Dworkin and Lord Devlon in his paper . Ramraj # 8217 ; s statement can be broken down into two chief constituents ; foremost he argues that the # 8220 ; construct # 8221 ; put Forth by the Charter as a whole was to advance equality and the rights of minority and besieged groups. This is where positive and negative autonomies enter the image. The rights of minorities non to be condemned to listen to harmful messages and literature is a positive autonomy, while the ability for person to orate or compose these positions is a negative autonomy. This is a sensible statement, but is every bit limited as Kilgour # 8217 ; s and Raymaker # 8217 ; s. Although people may acknowledge the predicament of minorities, that does non intend that we must reprobate those responsible for distributing these positions to condemnable action. Ramraj # 8217 ; s 2nd chief statement is that there is really decidedly a topographic point for ethical motives in the jurisprudence. This position is really clearly expressed in Lord Devlon # 8217 ; s # 8220 ; Morality and the Criminal Law # 8221 ; . This statement is hard to rebut, after all this is itself a moral issue. Finally, Bruce Elman represents the hardline attack to the issue of restricting free address. In his 1994 paper, he wrote, # 8220 ; Finally, there is of import symbolic value in holding a jurisprudence forbiding the airing of hatred propaganda. Our society must do a clear statement as to the values which we deem of cardinal importance # 8230 ; . we must be prepared to back up these values with condemnable countenances if necessary. # 8221 ; He besides states in the same essay that enforcing condemnable countenance is less desirable than back uping these nucleus values through human rights statute law or civil jurisprudence. There are battalions of other statements for either side of the war ; those described in this essay seem to capture more of society than do others. As stated in the debut, the war between freedom of look and societal intolerance may last for centuries. While the positions discussed in this essay are non diametrically opposed, they are no where near to making a consensus. Those who advocate # 8220 ; detest Torahs # 8221 ; look to be willing to negociate ; most agree that there is no demand for condemnable countenances. Those that stand against any ordinance of freedom of look are firm opposed to any countenances, condemnable or otherwise. Before I was assigned this paper, I had neer given much thought to this topic. Choosing on which side to fall, is non an easy determination to do. I hold highly high ethical motives and rules. I detest racism in all its signifiers, and see it as one of the three eating elements blighting our society ( the other two are drugs, and the subjectification of adult females ) . While I wish that racialists could be shot into outer infinite, I have to side with Chomsky on this argument. I agree that there is small topographic point for authorities intercession in freedom of address. This is non an all across-the-board position, of class ; menaces should be excluded, every bit good as words motivating injury. I would be willing to concede to civil jurisprudence on the topic ; so long as it was really carefully tailored. My ain feelings on the affair were best described by Justice McLachlin in her dissent in Keegstra: # 8220 ; The vile of hatred propaganda is beyond uncertainty # 8230 ; The danger here is non so much that the statute law will discourage those dead set on advancing hatred # 8230 ; The danger is instead that the statute law may hold a cooling consequence on legitimate activities of import to our society by subjecting inexperienced person individuals to restraints born out of fright for the condemnable process. # 8221 ; The split in that tribunal determination has played an of import factor in the continuance of the argument. Any given composing of the tribunal may turn out a different determination. It will be interesting to see if the Supreme Court hears the issue once more sometime in the close hereafter. In my position, make up ones minding the issue of freedom of address does non needfully affair, so long as we are debating it. If we are debating it that means that society recognizes the possible jobs. Equally long as society recognizes the possible jobs we will neer be capable to the same conditions that led to the holocaust in World War Two Germany.